ADL generates its own, undocumented , debug TRACE output in the CUS4 element of the Target Monitoring Tool.
Exanple:
****** Traces ******
Type From Level
Trace CUS4 20 [ADL] tmr subs ; id 0 ; hdlr 002118A9 ; val 10 ; cycl 0
Trace CUS4 21 Get Mem 01061318
Trace CUS4 21 Rel Mem 01061318
Trace CUS4 23 [ADL] Gpio subs 00000200 00000200 00000400 1 : 2
Trace CUS4 30 SIM event 2
Trace CUS4 23 [ADL] Gpio Read 2 00000200 : 00000000I can’t find these mentioned anywhere in the documentation (v3.03 or 3.12), although the Trace Level definitions are in adl_traces.h :
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_ERROR 20
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_MEMORY 21
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_FLASH 22
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_DAC 23
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_GPIO 23
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_BUS 24
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_FCM 25
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_SMS 26
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_CALL 27
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_AT 28
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_SAFE 29
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_SIM 30
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_PORT 30
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_GPRS 31
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_RTC 31
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_AD 32
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_GPS 32
Oops - duplicate: wavecom.com/modules/movie/sc … php?t=1217
But why didn’t my search for ADL_TRC_ find that??
awneil
April 11, 2008, 2:04pm
3
Several releases, and nearly a year later - and they are still
It’s not even as if this is an obsolete feature and, thus, not worth documenting - the following had been added by SDK v4.24:
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_IRQ 29
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_AUDIO 29
#define ADL_TRC_LEVEL_OSA 32
awneil
August 6, 2009, 10:14am
4
Another 18 months, and more releases, and things have just got worse!
These Trace levels are still used, but now (since v5r00?) they aren’t even listed in adl_traces.h - they are now entirely undocumented
awneil
January 28, 2010, 11:13am
5
Note that “CUS4 ” is now “ADL ”
awneil
April 5, 2010, 10:06pm
6
R7.4a (possibly others) now seems to use level 15 for the RTC; eg,
davidc
May 11, 2010, 10:26am
7
Hiya,
Having undocumented system traces in the ADL output is a right pain.
Can we put in a feature request for these system traces to be moved to the appropriate SYSTEM level, and leave all 31 traces available for development.
And yes, I’m using nearly all the trace levels in a particularly complex application. I
ciao, Dave
awneil
May 11, 2010, 11:03am
8
Absolutely!
Seconded.
Me too - that is, of course, how I discovered this undocumented and annoying feature in the first place!
awneil
August 18, 2010, 5:55am
9
It seems that level 20 is also used by the Backtrace analysis.
awneil
May 18, 2011, 6:24am
10
