Specification / Feature List for New Target Management?

[awneil]

@daav

Do you mean the embedded application?

Yes.

Isn’t the AT command enough for this case?

An AT command would do - but see: New Features - Complete API

See also: AT+WMFM - Inconsistent (and unhelpful) Behaviour

@awneil

I think this is already behaving correctly in the current Target Management traces view (‘&’ printed as ‘&’, not as ‘_’)

Quite possibly - just a note to make sure it doesn’t regress…